You are viewing Orangepower as a Guest. To start new threads, reply to posts, or participate in polls or contests - you must register. Registration is free and easy. Click Here to register.
I'm not a lawyer, but I wonder if the fact that there a few active investigations ongoing has anything to do with releasing evidence. Maybe I am mistaken though. Better question for @CowboyJD
I guess we missed this little nugget: "Revolver.news is a news site and turned out to be one of the last honest outlets on the internet. A new piece on the site suggests an answer to some of these questions." God, I fell for the title, the facepalms and the tweets and watched. Again stupidly misleading at best. Maybe we should read or watch what we are facepalming before we post. Maybe??
So for argument sake let’s just say the fbi did infiltrate the groups in question. Furthermore, let’s say the fbi did encourage the groups’ excitement levels and told them they had rapid response teams actually set up to attack the capital. Lastly, let’s assume the groups believed the fbi infiltrators.
As a general rule, if you're talking about doing crimes with someone on the internet, you should assume that's an FBI agent who will not actually do the crimes with you.
Don't do crimes, but if you must, don't plan them with your internet friends.
So for argument sake let’s just say the fbi did infiltrate the groups in question. Furthermore, let’s say the fbi did encourage the groups’ excitement levels and told them they had rapid response teams actually set up to attack the capital. Lastly, let’s assume the groups believed the fbi infiltrators.
As a general rule, if you're talking about doing crimes with someone on the internet, you should assume that's an FBI agent who will not actually do the crimes with you.
Don't do crimes, but if you must, don't plan them with your internet friends.