-
You are viewing Orangepower as a Guest. To start new threads, reply to posts, or participate in polls or contests - you must register. Registration is free and easy. Click Here to register.
That’s not what you said earlier when you said you were being honest (your word). Why don’t you really be honest and say what you keep dancing around?
Honestly (your word) what true asylum seekers can afford to fly into the US and present themselves at customs and what asylum seeker leaving a country ravaged by poverty and 2 natural disasters travels across multiple countries in 100 degree weather and then lives under a bridge?
Honestly (your word) what true asylum seekers can afford to fly into the US and present themselves at customs and what asylum seeker leaving a country ravaged by poverty and 2 natural disasters travels across multiple countries in 100 degree weather and then lives under a bridge?
I did say that and I stand by it, so you can go pound sand with your feeble attempts to distort my comments. I support granting asylum to people seeking it under genuine conditions that meet the requirements and follow the due process, period. What has been going on at the southern border is plain and simple anarchy by masses of people who are trying to enter for reasons NOT allowed as a basis. If you can’t see that then you are neck deep into Biden’s southern border.
I don't know anything about the CIS, but I've seen their data used by bipartisan news outlets. Are you claiming their statistics are inaccurate? I thought it was a given fact that non-citizens accessed welfare at a higher rate than regular citizens due to the fact that they have a much higher rate of poverty.
I said what I said.
If you want to not know anything about CIS and remain ignorant to their origins, that’s fine by me.
Yes, there is substantial reason to be suspicious of any claim by CIS. Their methodology and reports have been repeatedly criticized as false and misleading by many from both sides of the political aisle.
If it is a given fact that non-citizens accessed welfare at a higher rate than regular citizens, I'm sure you could find support from someone other than somebody who said, ""One of my prime concerns is about the decline of folks who look like you and me ... for European-American society and culture to persist requires a European-American majority, and a clear one at that" and is an advocate of eugenics and sterilization of "genetically undesirable" groups. I'm not saying it's NOT a given fact. I don't know for sure. I'm just saying if it IS a given fact, you might be better served in proving that without associating yourself with and using garbage data generated by garbage human beings.
That's all I'm saying.....
You do you, though.
If you want to not know anything about CIS and remain ignorant to their origins, that’s fine by me.
Yes, there is substantial reason to be suspicious of any claim by CIS. Their methodology and reports have been repeatedly criticized as false and misleading by many from both sides of the political aisle.
If it is a given fact that non-citizens accessed welfare at a higher rate than regular citizens, I'm sure you could find support from someone other than somebody who said, ""One of my prime concerns is about the decline of folks who look like you and me ... for European-American society and culture to persist requires a European-American majority, and a clear one at that" and is an advocate of eugenics and sterilization of "genetically undesirable" groups. I'm not saying it's NOT a given fact. I don't know for sure. I'm just saying if it IS a given fact, you might be better served in proving that without associating yourself with and using garbage data generated by garbage human beings.
That's all I'm saying.....
You do you, though.
Last edited:
Here's a study from the Urban Institute. It should be noted that refugees that are granted asylum generally qualify for welfare benefits while undocumented immigrants generally do not. That's why you see such a wide variance in noncitizen statistics. The percentage of noncitizen households receiving welfare would be much higher if they only used households that qualified for welfare.
In all fairness, I don't know anything about the Urban Institute either, so you may take exception to them as well. But it's estimated 15.1% of native born citizens and 25.3% of noncitizens live below the poverty line. Basic logic would tell you that noncitizens households would access welfare at a higher level simply because of their income.
Despite the fact that refugees access welfare at a much higher rate, I'm not arguing against the process. We should grant asylum to anyone that proves they qualify for it. I just don't think we should be granting asylum to everyone reaching our southern border claiming to seek it. This would essentially give us open borders.
In all fairness, I don't know anything about the Urban Institute either, so you may take exception to them as well. But it's estimated 15.1% of native born citizens and 25.3% of noncitizens live below the poverty line. Basic logic would tell you that noncitizens households would access welfare at a higher level simply because of their income.
Despite the fact that refugees access welfare at a much higher rate, I'm not arguing against the process. We should grant asylum to anyone that proves they qualify for it. I just don't think we should be granting asylum to everyone reaching our southern border claiming to seek it. This would essentially give us open borders.
-
1
- Show all
Well funny thing is the facts are that more than twice as many miles of border wall were erected during the Obama administration as compared to the Trump administration. Plus it looks like Biden is building more wall, he is just hiding it under a different name.
https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-p...ial&utm_campaign=BidenBorderWall&utm_content=
https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-p...ial&utm_campaign=BidenBorderWall&utm_content=
-
1
- Show all
