Those who caused destruction should face justice.
At what point, though, should the federal government be able to step in if the state and local authorities appear to have abandoned their citizens to the criminals?
I'm not saying we've reached any point like that, but some of these states/cities don't appear to be trying very hard.
It's a fine line, but when does the welfare of the law abiding citizens take precedence at the federal level to that of the states?
Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
At what point, though, should the federal government be able to step in if the state and local authorities appear to have abandoned their citizens to the criminals?
I'm not saying we've reached any point like that, but some of these states/cities don't appear to be trying very hard.
It's a fine line, but when does the welfare of the law abiding citizens take precedence at the federal level to that of the states?
Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
Never.
NEVER.
They should stick to only those crimes which constitute a violation of federal law.
Forever.
It's not a fine line. It's the bright and red line of the Constitutional principle of federalism.
Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk