Ok genius, riddle me this.
If the "memo" as you call it is not an accurate reflection of Trump's conversation with the President of Ukraine, why is Schiff now saying he does not need the whistleblower when he has the memo?
And if the "memo" is the only documented version of the call, what do you ever hope to learn or accomplish by claiming it is not accurate?
Also, while you're at it, why are the Ds emphatic Trump broke the law in his call while the DOJ determined long ago there were no laws broken in the conversation between Trunp and Zelensky?
Ok I’ll slow it down for you. The Trump WH labeled that document a Memorandum on the top of the effin page. Not me. Trump’s own people. 2nd read the bottom of the 1st page. The footnote says again it’s a Memorandum and not verbatim. ITS NOT THE ACTUAL WORDS FROM THE CALL. 3rd the memo that was released only reads for 10 minutes while the actual call lasted for 30 minutes. While the Ukr Pres does speak English it is being reported that a translator was used but that doesn’t account for 20 minutes
I think Schiff has misplayed this a few times and at the end of the day am still out on the strategy of not hearing from the WB. This plus the lack of leaks from those testifying to date make me think they are hearing what they need and don’t think they need the WB to testify.
And there’s no way a Billy Barr DoJ is going against DoJ guidelines and charging a sitting POTUS. Hell Barr’s DoJ has been arguing in court that you can’t even investigate one.
In the end the impeachment charges will not just be from this WB. I think they start w Obstruction of Congress. Bring in what they find from these depositions. Possibly the obstruction of Justice from Mueller and if the 2 House Committees are fortunate they get his taxes/financial records sometime this Spring and then I bet he resigns.