-
You are viewing Orangepower as a Guest. To start new threads, reply to posts, or participate in polls or contests - you must register. Registration is free and easy. Click Here to register.
You are making my point. We don’t know anything. So why would anyone discourage any treatment? You are full of crap and you know it. Just parrot what your told, sheep.
Comparing HCQ to the vaccine is just stupid. That’s apples and oranges. HCQ is to treat covid not prevent it. Also, I’ll be waits for all these treatments for covid with the science behind it. So you think we should have just let everyone die like we did, because a drug may theoretically hurt them. You people are something else.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comparing HCQ to the vaccine is just stupid. That’s apples and oranges. HCQ is to treat covid not prevent it. Also, I’ll be waits for all these treatments for covid with the science behind it. So you think we should have just let everyone die like we did, because a drug may theoretically hurt them. You people are something else.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited:
-
1
- Show all
Hey stalker, when are you going to answer this post from the other thread 
Yes, you are absolutely correct I will reply. I think YOU need to read this and take some time to digest it.
Let’s talk about this post first. I was in a conversation with someone else that had nothing to do with you and in your typical stalker fashion, you butted in and took an opportunity to insult me again like you do in EVERY SINGLE THREAD.
Then you put doctor in quotation marks as if implying I am not one or incompetent because I don’t line up to take an EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE like you think I should and I have pointed out other ways to treat and prevent getting covid. I would be glad to PM you links to my reviews and you can see what my ACTUAL PATIENTS think of me. As long as you give me your word you won’t share my identity with anyone.
Now let’s just talk about what you have been doing in general. You have been stalking me and making slanderous accusations about my psychological health that are absolutely not true. You might want to be careful about that. I am a professional and if one person were to read that and it caused them not to see me as a professional, that could be costly for you.
I am sorry that my post “TRIGGER YOU”. That is more a reflection on your psychological health than mine. Add to that the extremely personal info you decided to share in your last post in this thread on a public forum and the fact that you seem to be stalking me on this forum, it would make some (especially healthcare professionals) wonder if you are the one with the issues you accuse me of.
I suggest you stop this behavior immediately.
That being said, do you want me to post those videos of Biden’s behavior around young girls and you can defend them? In all that BS you posted you didn’t answer the question I actually asked you.
Well, actually I guess you did answer it by not answering it. Play on, Sir.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, you are absolutely correct I will reply. I think YOU need to read this and take some time to digest it.
Let’s talk about this post first. I was in a conversation with someone else that had nothing to do with you and in your typical stalker fashion, you butted in and took an opportunity to insult me again like you do in EVERY SINGLE THREAD.
Then you put doctor in quotation marks as if implying I am not one or incompetent because I don’t line up to take an EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE like you think I should and I have pointed out other ways to treat and prevent getting covid. I would be glad to PM you links to my reviews and you can see what my ACTUAL PATIENTS think of me. As long as you give me your word you won’t share my identity with anyone.
Now let’s just talk about what you have been doing in general. You have been stalking me and making slanderous accusations about my psychological health that are absolutely not true. You might want to be careful about that. I am a professional and if one person were to read that and it caused them not to see me as a professional, that could be costly for you.
I am sorry that my post “TRIGGER YOU”. That is more a reflection on your psychological health than mine. Add to that the extremely personal info you decided to share in your last post in this thread on a public forum and the fact that you seem to be stalking me on this forum, it would make some (especially healthcare professionals) wonder if you are the one with the issues you accuse me of.
I suggest you stop this behavior immediately.
That being said, do you want me to post those videos of Biden’s behavior around young girls and you can defend them? In all that BS you posted you didn’t answer the question I actually asked you.
Well, actually I guess you did answer it by not answering it. Play on, Sir.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited:
-
1
- Show all
I'd add that delayed onset side effects are insanely rare with vaccines. Technically, we don't know that they don't happen, but we also have to ask ourselves, what kind of time interval are we OK with? Given the track record of vaccines, if serious side effects haven't cropped up after a few months, the chances of them cropping up are likely negligible.
-
1
- Show all
Who "judges" what is good and bad science when scientist and doctors and data sometimes disagree with one another? Like I said, it's a free country and the end user of healthcare get's to decide their best options for themselves in a free country. Freedom comes with some risk...Many Americans are still willing to take those risk...I'm a supporter of that personal freedom...Plus this world not being the end makes it easier to live in healthcare freedom, because death isn't the end for the believer. The marketplace will work out the issues you are addressing, as will the results. We have given over 64 million vaccines to date...Numbers of covid cases, hospitalizations, and death are all sharply down...that to me is the strongest argument to date for the vaccine. IF those numbers continue to climb and the virus is all but gone from the general population that will be the proof I personally need that the vaccine has worked.
Last edited:
Well there are ways to examine studies to determine wether they are “good studies”. The difference here is it is a new disease so obviously there were no “good studies” to look at. The stance of the government and its parrots makes no sense unless you follow the money.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree with you that research should be ethical and that is why boards and oversight exist...but I also see a place for the free market to provide alternative treatments to the standardly accepted ones...we are speaking about different things... I agree unethical research OR unethical governmental / big money sponsorship should and are looked at in a free society by opposing forces...this very process of freedom is what I mean by the free "marketplace" (maybe freedom of "science" is a better term?) at work. Certainly the market can drive fraud and corruption both for a time, but it ultimately it weeds it out when free ideas on ALL sides of science and the market flow. The danger is in squelching this freedom of expression.
I'm just glad it looks like the vaccine and the number of infections that were undiagnosed along with those confirmed appears to have the virus on the ropes. I'm excited to actually be able to sit down with my parents without mask soon sense we are all vaccinated now...they got #2 of Pfizer on Saturday.
I'm just glad it looks like the vaccine and the number of infections that were undiagnosed along with those confirmed appears to have the virus on the ropes. I'm excited to actually be able to sit down with my parents without mask soon sense we are all vaccinated now...they got #2 of Pfizer on Saturday.
Last edited:
No, it doesn't "weed it all out". That's why the pharmaceutical market isn't free, it is the most heavily regulated market there is. We had a free and open market of pharmaceuticals once, when we had cocaine in soft drinks, and morphine in cough syrup, and patent medicines that did nothing.
It has absolutely nothing to do with freedom of expression. Sheez, you keep making your argument worse and worse. Just stop.
It has absolutely nothing to do with freedom of expression. Sheez, you keep making your argument worse and worse. Just stop.
No, that isn't "CYA". Companies seek new markets for their drugs all the time. That is a company saying there is no scientific basis for the use of their drug for a particular indication.
You didn't answer my question, continuing to tout it after the company that makes it says there is no scientific basis for it, is that good or bad science?
You didn't answer my question, continuing to tout it after the company that makes it says there is no scientific basis for it, is that good or bad science?