-
You are viewing Orangepower as a Guest. To start new threads, reply to posts, or participate in polls or contests - you must register. Registration is free and easy. Click Here to register.
Think about how deep we are at WR if we can RS a 6'6" guy with 4.4 speed. Of course with the RS rules changing, who says we can't hold him off until a few games late in the year and put him in at the goal line and run a fade with him and McKauffman 6'6" on the outside. With a 6'7" Woods as a CW with McClesky or Stoner for good measure and still have Hill or King to account for. That would be a nightmare.
-
6
- Show all
WR is loaded. My concerns lies with improvement on the offensive line. I think if we have a good line then Hill would be looked at as by far the best RB in the big 12 and probably the country. OU has some good RBs but they wouldn’t put the numbers Hill plasters with our line. OU has one of the best olines in the country.
Bottom line, I think OSU could contend for a big 12 title with a good offensive line. Our offense will be elite with a good line. Our defense will probably be about the same as always but we could compete with any team in the big 12 if we could have a good Oline. I say this because we could control the game with Hill and our nightmare matchups at WR.
Some our probably wondering about QB but I’m not worried because Cornelius is good enough. He can make the intermediate passes down field that will open up hill for big runs. He doesn’t have the deep threat like mason but he will be able to slice up a defense and make some decent throws.
Bottom line, I think OSU could contend for a big 12 title with a good offensive line. Our offense will be elite with a good line. Our defense will probably be about the same as always but we could compete with any team in the big 12 if we could have a good Oline. I say this because we could control the game with Hill and our nightmare matchups at WR.
Some our probably wondering about QB but I’m not worried because Cornelius is good enough. He can make the intermediate passes down field that will open up hill for big runs. He doesn’t have the deep threat like mason but he will be able to slice up a defense and make some decent throws.
Well, our OL should be and really must be better than last year, but if it is say 5% better that will not be good. We had an average OL last year, so we need a large improvement. Of course, it is the defense that is the major concern, with our gundyized cream puff schedule we should be at 10 or less PTS allowed per game going into conf play. I hope we can beat BSU and it has some merit late in the season not that it will really matter much.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
1
- Show all
Our defense is always a liability but in the big 12 it’s rare to see a great defense. If you have decent athletes out there then you are online with most teams. Luckily for us, most defenses won’t be able to stop our offense. I think we see OU taking a step back this year. I know they have Riley but they also don’t have mayfield. The big 12 is wide open.
This should be a breakout year for Johnson. In fact, I'm predicting he quickly helps us in a Washington-like way.
We know how capable the slot guys are. The rest are a question mark, but we've been in "reload" position with receivers for years.
Of course, the most important thing about our receivers is having a guy that can get the ball to them.
I have no concerns over the receivers.
We just have no clue as to who's going to replace Rudolph.
Let the games begin.
We know how capable the slot guys are. The rest are a question mark, but we've been in "reload" position with receivers for years.
Of course, the most important thing about our receivers is having a guy that can get the ball to them.
I have no concerns over the receivers.
We just have no clue as to who's going to replace Rudolph.
Let the games begin.