Last night was difficult to watch unfold. Whether you have a timeout or not, you have the ability to control the pace of the game, put the breaks on Cade, and tell him that we are taking the last shot. And you call the set you would like to see him do it in. Therefore, you have the secondary options in the right place as well. He says well Cade thought he saw an opening in the press conference. So what? Stop him, call a play, and worst case scenario is overtime.
Having Cade inbounding and not having him as the guy to shoot free throws is unimaginable as well. In presser, MB says Cade is our best decision maker so that's why he was inbounder. Cade leads our team in turnovers, and the next closest guy is 10 behind him (I am aware he has the highest usage but he's also played 2 less games than many of them as well). Cade is the same "best decision maker" who thought it would be smart to take the last shot with 10 seconds left. Then in the presser, MB is talking about he was more upset with the decision of the guys to chase the ball in the backcourt instead of getting back on defense. The players were probably completely stunned and confused as to what Cade just did. Last week, Cade decided he would not start because Boone earned that spot. Cade decides the starting line ups now?
I like MB but he has to coach Cade. He can't treat him with kitten gloves in the press conference when Cade/&MB clearly made the critical errors late and throw the other players under the bus. Cade won't be here next year. What is the fear in coaching him and making him better? He averages 3.5 turnovers a game. Calling him our best decision maker to avoid the question of having him be the free throw shooter. The numbers are clear. Cade is 83% FT shooter and he has proven to make them late. Cade seems like a great kid. I am guessing he wants to be coached. Cade is an absolute stud. Don't miss this opportunity with a great player by being afraid to coach him or be critical of him.
I won't get into how we continue to play on the line, up the line man to man that just simply doesn't work like it did 20 years ago when you were allowed to hand check a dribbler. Underwood has adapted from that knowing this isn't the Southland any more. This is power 5 ball and the ballhandlers are too good to be left on an island.
Alright, I was going to avoid posting the frustration of the end of the game, but then I watched that press conference and it got me irritated. MB has a few weeks to get this figured out, and he needs to remember that he wants the other players to be good next year, as Cade will be gone. But most importantly, MB is the head coach. In his press conference, it doesn't always sound like that.
Sorry for the long post. I like Coach Boynton. I think he's the man for the job. And this is a perfect opportunity to grow as coach and coach a player like Cade Cunningham.
Couldn't agree more with a lot of your points. I'll preface my points by saying I really like Coach Boynton as well and really want him to be here for the long term. That said, and I said this after the West Virginia game, he won't survive if he continues with the late game collapses. For a coaching bench with 3 individuals who are or have been head coaches, our late game coaching decisions are very poor.
I also don't like the lack of coaching going on around Cade. Everyone realizes he's going to be drafted in the lottery (though if I was a GM, I'm not sure I'd draft him), but when a lottery pick's +/- in a game versus TCU is -10, something is off. Without question the offense has much more movement when Cade isn't in the game. When he's in the game, our offense typically reverts to the James Harden Houston offense of dribble, dribble, dribble and drive into a double team. This isn't a shot at Cade, but at the coaching staff. Cade excels in an uptempo, open court scenario (as does the rest of our very quick and athletic roster). However, when Cade walks the ball upcourt (as he did the last 5 or so possessions last night), the rest of our team stands and watches. Again, coaching.
Defensively, I think this roster excels when they play an active zone defense. Think back to the Marquette game. They were destroyed last night by TCU's back cuts when they played man. Again, our roster is very quick and athletic, which is perfect for an active zone defense.
Last, I'm not sure what happened to Ice and Boone last night. I never thought I'd see the day when Ice was benched - maybe he's injured? Boone reverted to his early season form where he looked lost on the court, after playing three outstanding games in a row. This team has to have Boone play well to succeed.
I'll never understand bad free throw shooting. I played in a very competitive hoops league about 5 years ago at the age of 50 - stupid decision, as it resulted in a planter fascitis issue. However, before I was injured, I was 16 of 20 at the free throw line, and I hadn't played in over 10 years. How does a 20 year old who practices for multiple hours every day not shoot at least 75% from the free throw line? For everyone who throws out Shaq as an example, I respond with Karl Malone. His first year in the NBA he shot sub 50% from the free throw line. He finished his NBA career with an overall FT% of 74%. He practiced shooting free throws.