-
You are viewing Orangepower as a Guest. To start new threads, reply to posts, or participate in polls or contests - you must register. Registration is free and easy. Click Here to register.
I got y’all. Alright... here are the most important games in the next two weeks. This, of course, assumes we win out against the remaining Texas teams. (TTU, TCU, BU).
November 28th:
1. Texas vs ISU (ISU NEEDS to win)
2. UO vs WVU (doesn’t matter either way)
December 5th:
1. ISU vs WVU (WVU NEEDS to win)
2. Texas vs KSU (KSU must if ISU lost to Texas)
3. UO vs BU (doesn’t matter either way).
CCG:
Bedlam 2.0.
This is the most realistic scenario. Texas needs ONE more loss either to ISU or KSU which is possible. The goons are not losing another game, so don’t count on the other teams winning against them. Lastly, ISU needs ONE more loss either to Texas or WVU. ISU is the only realistic team to beat Texas, so WVU has to be the one to beat ISU.
These are the team to root for.
I like to consider our game against the Goons last night on how Daniel-San first fought Johnny Lawrence. If we see them in the CCG for Bedlam 2.0.....I suspect a much more competitive fight from OSU.
November 28th:
1. Texas vs ISU (ISU NEEDS to win)
2. UO vs WVU (doesn’t matter either way)
December 5th:
1. ISU vs WVU (WVU NEEDS to win)
2. Texas vs KSU (KSU must if ISU lost to Texas)
3. UO vs BU (doesn’t matter either way).
CCG:
Bedlam 2.0.
This is the most realistic scenario. Texas needs ONE more loss either to ISU or KSU which is possible. The goons are not losing another game, so don’t count on the other teams winning against them. Lastly, ISU needs ONE more loss either to Texas or WVU. ISU is the only realistic team to beat Texas, so WVU has to be the one to beat ISU.
These are the team to root for.
I like to consider our game against the Goons last night on how Daniel-San first fought Johnny Lawrence. If we see them in the CCG for Bedlam 2.0.....I suspect a much more competitive fight from OSU.
-
2
-
1
- Show all
Yes. This path he’s talking about is if UO drops a game against Baylor or West Virgina....along with ISU winning out, that means OSU vs ISU in Arlington.
UO is NOT losing to WVU or Baylor, they’re not. We can see ISU beating Texas and slipping against WVU, that’s a real possibility. If that happens...it’s Bedlam 2.0, why?
There’s would be a 3-way time between:
1. ISU 2 loss (OSU, WVU)
2. UO 2 loss (ISU, KSU)
3. OSU 2 loss (UT, UO)
If I understand the tie breaker correctly....actually. I think we’re left out because we got blown out by UO. Now I’m not sure anymore...I had thought since we had the head to head against ISU we were in but ISU has the head to head against UO..
UO is NOT losing to WVU or Baylor, they’re not. We can see ISU beating Texas and slipping against WVU, that’s a real possibility. If that happens...it’s Bedlam 2.0, why?
There’s would be a 3-way time between:
1. ISU 2 loss (OSU, WVU)
2. UO 2 loss (ISU, KSU)
3. OSU 2 loss (UT, UO)
If I understand the tie breaker correctly....actually. I think we’re left out because we got blown out by UO. Now I’m not sure anymore...I had thought since we had the head to head against ISU we were in but ISU has the head to head against UO..
You are correct. All 3 teams would be 1-1 against each other. The next tiebreaking rule is to compare records with the next highest team in the standings which is most likely Texas. In that case, OU would have the advantage and move ahead. We have the loss to Texas and the ISU/Texas winner is still TBD.
So you would rather not take 2nd in the Big12 and play in the title game and have another shot at OU because we would lose to them again?
Not the competitive type, eh?
I guess I am wired different. I would much rather see my team play for a shot at a title even if that meant another bad loss to my rival, than to not have a chance to compete at all.
Not the competitive type, eh?
I guess I am wired different. I would much rather see my team play for a shot at a title even if that meant another bad loss to my rival, than to not have a chance to compete at all.
-
1
- Show all
