The coming war?

  • You are viewing Orangepower as a Guest. To start new threads, reply to posts, or participate in polls or contests - you must register. Registration is free and easy. Click Here to register.

llcoolw

Territorial Marshal
Feb 7, 2005
6,556
3,302
1,743
Sammamish, Washington.Dallas, Texas.Maui, Hawaii
#1
Speech by Comrade Chi Haotian Vice-Chairman of China's Military Commission
The following is the actual text of a speech delivered in December, 2005 by Comrade Chi Haotian the Vice-Chairman of China's Military Commission to top officers and generals. Keep in mind that China has for many years advocated deceitful and covert warfare against its enemies. This is their Modus Operandi. There should be little question that a "Bird Flu" Pandemic would deeply excite them. (Don't forget how they have poisoned thousands of American pets and knowingly placed lead paints on toddler's toys.)


"Comrades, I'm very excited today, because the large-scale online survey sina.com that was done for us showed that our next generation is quite promising and our Party's cause will be carried on. In answering the question, "Will you shoot at women, children and prisoners of war," more than 80 per cent of the respondents answered in the affirmative, exceeding by far our expectations. Today I'd like to focus on why we asked sina.com to conduct this online survey among our people. My speech today is a sequel to my speech last time, during which I started with a discussion of the issue of the three islands [Taiwan, Diaoyu Islands and the Spratley Islands --- Ott] and mentioned that 20 years of the idyllic theme of 'peace and development' had come to an end, and concluded that modernization under the saber is the only option for China's next phase. I also mentioned we have a vital stake overseas. The central issue of this survey appears to be whether one should shoot at women, children and prisoners of war, but its real significance goes far beyond that. Ostensibly, our intention is mainly to figure out what the Chinese people's attitude towards war is: If these future soldiers do not hesitate to kill even noncombatants, they'll naturally be doubly ready and ruthless in killing combatants. Therefore, the responses to the survey questions may reflect the general attitude people have towards war..We wanted to know: If China's global development will necessitate massive deaths in enemy countries; will our people endorse that scenario? Will they be for or against it?

The fact is, our 'development' refers to the great revitalization of the Chinese nation, which, of course, is not limited to the land we have now but also includes the whole world. As everybody knows, according to the views propagated by the Western scholars, humanity as a whole originated from one single mother in Africa. Therefore no race can claim racial superiority. However, according to the research conducted by most Chinese scholars, the Chinese are different from other races on earth. We did not originate in Africa. Instead, we originated independently in the land of China. Therefore, we can rightfully assert that we are the product of cultural roots of more than a million years, civilization and progress of more than ten thousand years, an ancient nation of five thousand years, and a single Chinese entity of two thousand years. This is the Chinese nation that calls itself 'descendants of Yan and Huang.'

During our long history, our people have disseminated throughout the Americas and the regions along the Pacific Rim, and they became Indians in the Americas and the East Asian ethnic groups in the South Pacific. We all know that on account of our national superiority, during the thriving and prosperous Tang Dynasty our civilization was at the peak of the world. We were the centre of the world civilization, and no other civilization in the world was comparable to ours. Later on, because of our complacency, narrow-mindedness, and the self-enclosure of our own country, we were surpassed by Western civilization, and the centre of the world shifted to the West.

In reviewing history, one may ask: Will the centre of the world civilization shift back to China? Actually, Comrade Liu Huaqing made similar points in early 1980's Based on an historical analysis, he pointed out that the centre of world civilization is shifting. It shifted from the East to Western Europe and later to the United States; now it is shifting back to the East. Therefore, if we refer to the 19th Century as the British Century and the 20th century as the American Century, then the 21st Century will be the Chinese Century! (Wild applause fills the auditorium.)

Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans because, fundamentally, our race is superior to theirs. As a result, we have a longer history, more people, and larger land area. On this basis, our ancestors left us with the two most essential heritages, which are atheism and great unity. It was Confucius, the founder of our Chinese culture, who gave us these heritages. These two heritages determined that we have a stronger ability to survive than the West. That is why the Chinese race has been able to prosper for so long. We are destined 'not to be buried by either heaven or earth' no matter how severe the natural, man-made, and national disasters. This is our advantage. Take response to war as an example. The reason that the United States remains today is that it has never seen war on its mainland. Once its enemies aim at the mainland, the enemies would have already reached Washington before its congress finishes debating and authorizes the president to declare war. But for us, we don't waste time on these trivial things. Maybe you have now come to understand why we recently decided to further promulgate atheism. If we let theology from the West into China and empty us from the inside, if we let all Chinese people listen to God and follow God, who will obediently listen to us and follow us? If the common people don't believe Comrade Hu Jintao is a qualified leader, begin to question his authority, and want to monitor him, if the religious followers in our society question why we are leading God in churches, can our Party continue to rule China??

The first pressing issue facing us is living space. This is the biggest focus of the revitalization of the Chinese race. In my last speech, I said that the fight over basic living resources (including land and ocean) is the source of the vast majority of wars in history. This may change in the information age, but not fundamentally. Our per capita resources are much less than those of Germany's back then. In addition, economic development in the last twenty-plus years had a negative impact, and climates are rapidly changing for the worse. Our resources are in very short supply. The environment is severely polluted, especially that of soil, water, and air. Not only our ability to sustain and develop our race, but even its survival is gravely threatened, to a degree much greater than faced Germany back then Anybody who has been to Western countries knows that their living space is much better than ours. They have forests alongside the highways, while we hardly have any trees by our streets. Their sky is often blue with white clouds, while our sky is covered with a layer of dark haze. Their tap water is clean enough for drinking, while even our ground water is so polluted that it can't be drunk without filtering. They have few people in the streets, and two or three people can occupy a small residential building; in contrast our streets are always crawling with people, and several people have to share one room.

Many years ago, there was a book titled Yellow Catastrophes. It said that, due to our following the American style of consumption, our limited resources would no longer support the population and society would collapse once our population reaches 1.3 billion. Now our population has already exceeded this limit, and we are now relying on imports to sustain our nation. It's not that we haven't paid attention to this issue. The Ministry of Land Resources is specialized in this issue. But we must understand that the term 'living space' (lebenstraum) is too closely related to Nazi Germany.

The reason we don't want to discuss this too openly is to avoid the West's association of us with Nazi Germany, which could in turn reinforce the view that China is a threat. Therefore, in our emphasis on He Xin's new theory, 'Human Rights are just living rights' we only talk about 'living' but not 'space' so as to avoid using the term 'living space.' From the perspective of history, the reason that China is faced with the issue of living space is because Western countries have developed ahead of Eastern countries. Western countries established colonies all around the world, therefore giving themselves an advantage on the issue of living space. To solve this problem, we must lead the Chinese people outside of China, so that they can develop outside of China.

Would the United States allow us to go out to gain new living space? First, if the United States is firm in blocking us, it is hard for us to do anything significant to Taiwan and some other countries! Second, even if we could snatch some land from Taiwan, Vietnam, India, or even Japan, how much more living space can we get? Very trivial! Only countries like the United States, Canada and Australia have the vast land to serve our need for mass colonization.

Therefore, solving the 'issue of America' is the key to solving all other issues. First, this makes it possible for us to have many people migrate there and even establish another Chinaunder the same leadership of the CCP. America was originally discovered by the ancestors of the yellow race, but Columbus gave credit to the White race. We the descendants of the Chinese nation are ENTITLED to the possession of the land! It is historical destiny that China and United States will come into unavoidable confrontation on a narrow path and fight. In the long run, the relationship of China and the United States is one of a life-and-death struggle. Of course, right now it is not the time to openly break up with them yet. Our reform and opening to the outside world still rely on their capital and technology. We still need America. Therefore, we must do everything we can to promote our relationship with America, learn from America in all aspects and use America as an example to reconstruct our country. Only by using special means to 'clean up' America will we be able to lead the Chinese people there. Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves.

There has been rapid development of modern biological technology, and new bio weapons have been invented one after another. Of course we have not been idle; in the past years we have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of achieving our purpose of 'cleaning up' America all of a sudden. When Comrade Xiaoping was still with us, the Party Central Committee had the perspicacity to make the right decision not to develop aircraft carrier groups and focused instead on developing lethal weapons that can eliminate mass populations of the enemy country. Biological weapons are unprecedented in their ruthlessness, but if the Americans do not die then the Chinese have to die. If the Chinese people are strapped to the present land, a total societal collapse is bound to take place. According to the computations of the author of Yellow Peril, more than half of the Chinese will die, and that figure would be more than 800 million people! Just after the liberation, our yellow land supported nearly 500 million people, while today the official figure of the population is more than 1.3 billion. This yellow land has reached the limit of its capacity. One day, who know how soon it will come, the great collapse will occur any time and more than half of the population will have to go.

It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans. But that is the only path that will secure a Chinese century, a century in which the CCP leads the world. We, as revolutionary humanitarians, do not want deaths, But if history confronts us with a choice between deaths of Chinese and those of Americans, we'd have to pick the latter, as, for us, it is more important to safeguard the lives of the Chinese people and the life of our Party. The last problem I want to talk about is of firmly seizing the preparations for military battle. The central committee believes, as long as we resolve the United States problem at one blow, our domestic problems will all be readily solved. Therefore, our military battle preparation appears to aim at Taiwan, but in fact is aimed at the United States, and the preparation is far beyond the scope of attacking aircraft carriers or satellites. Marxism pointed out that violence is the midwife for the birth of the new society. Therefore war is the midwife for the birth of China's century."
 

Deere Poke

I'd rather be in the woods
A/V Subscriber
Feb 13, 2014
10,649
6,709
743
53
Bixby-Bristow OK
#9
I’ve never heard of this before? Anyone else? Plans for disarming Americans using Americans?
There was stuff in soviet documents about disarming America that surfaced after the collapse of the USSR. The communist have always had a world view that some day they will need to take over America. We are fool enough to finance them in China and elect them here.

The document is pretty crazy though.

The Chines population problem is going to turn the other way over the next 40 years. They have an aging population and with their one child policy they have no youth to replace them. Then they have another problem with the next generation, men outnumber women in a big way because everyone wanted their one child to be a boy. Over the next century China population is going to shrink bigly. They don't need to colonize.
 

SLVRBK

Johnny 8ball's PR Manager
Staff
A/V Subscriber
Oct 16, 2003
14,982
5,486
1,743
Katy, TX
#10
There was stuff in soviet documents about disarming America that surfaced after the collapse of the USSR. The communist have always had a world view that some day they will need to take over America. We are fool enough to finance them in China and elect them here.

The document is pretty crazy though.

The Chines population problem is going to turn the other way over the next 40 years. They have an aging population and with their one child policy they have no youth to replace them. Then they have another problem with the next generation, men outnumber women in a big way because everyone wanted their one child to be a boy. Over the next century China population is going to shrink bigly. They don't need to colonize.
By 2100 they will be less than half the size they are now...unless there is a baby boom
 

Deere Poke

I'd rather be in the woods
A/V Subscriber
Feb 13, 2014
10,649
6,709
743
53
Bixby-Bristow OK
#12
By 2100 they will be less than half the size they are now...unless there is a baby boom
I thought they were predicting 300-400 million by 2100. Population being halved in the next 40 years. But that's going off memory and my memory ain't what it used to be.
 

SLVRBK

Johnny 8ball's PR Manager
Staff
A/V Subscriber
Oct 16, 2003
14,982
5,486
1,743
Katy, TX
#13
They're gonna need a major scientific break through for that to happen. All those guys aren't gonna shit out babies.
When they finance the construction projects for the Belt & Road they usually send their people to do the work and hope they can marry locals.
 

SLVRBK

Johnny 8ball's PR Manager
Staff
A/V Subscriber
Oct 16, 2003
14,982
5,486
1,743
Katy, TX
#14
I thought they were predicting 300-400 million by 2100. Population being halved in the next 40 years. But that's going off memory and my memory ain't what it used to be.
I haven't seen anything that low for 2100 but have seen between 580 mil to 1 bil by 2100...have seen estimates under 300 mil by 2150.
 
Nov 6, 2010
1,851
649
1,743
#15
When they finance the construction projects for the Belt & Road they usually send their people to do the work and hope they can marry locals.
Yea, that's why that racial purity stuff isn't going anywhere long term. The world is just too small now. Hard to hate and kill someone based on race or ethnicity when half your population is married or friends with one of the "others".
 

UrbanCowboy1

Some cowboys gots smarts real good like me.
Aug 8, 2006
3,285
1,806
1,743
Phoenix, AZ
#16
As far as I can tell this is real.
I'm like, 99% sure it's fake.

Always have to be wary on things like this, and it shows one of the cardinal sins of something being faked from another language: colloquialisms.

'...a struggle of Life and Death'
'...solving the issue of America is the key'
'...we are at the peak of the world'

Sure, maybe the translator added some flair, but you don't usually see this in a good translation. Also, the repeated capitalization of 'God' is usually a giveaway that this is a western (US, most likely) forgery meant to scare the religious/conservative base. The author (not the speaker), respects the word and doesn't give the translation, only our version of that. Add to it that there is no mention of Allah, which is a WAAAY bigger issue in the western provinces and would show up in a speech like this. This seems to be talking specifically of a Christian God (churches are mentioned, not mosques).

All-in-all, it screams a fake to me. And even if it isn't, China can't even save it's own people from disease, so... not too worried about them invading (not nuking, which makes zero sense). They should be way more worried about India, anyway.

Fun read, though!
 
Last edited:

llcoolw

Territorial Marshal
Feb 7, 2005
6,556
3,302
1,743
Sammamish, Washington.Dallas, Texas.Maui, Hawaii
#17
I'm like, 99% sure it's fake.

Always have to be wary on things like this, and it shows one of the cardinal sins of something being faked from another language: colloquialisms.

'...a struggle of Life and Death'
'...solving the issue of America is the key'
'...we are at the peak of the world'

Sure, maybe the translator added some flair, but you don't usually see this in a good translation. Also, the repeated capitalization of 'God' is usually a giveaway that this is a western (US, most likely) forgery meant to scare the religious/conservative base. The author (not the speaker), respects the word and doesn't give the translation, only our version of that. Add to it that there is no mention of Allah, which is a WAAAY bigger issue in the western provinces and would show up in a speech like this. This seems to be talking specifically of a Christian God (churches are mentioned, not mosques).

All-in-all, it screams a fake to me. And even if it isn't, China can't even save it's own people from disease, so... not too worried about them invading (not nuking, which makes zero sense). They should be way more worried about India, anyway.

Fun read, though!
Try different browser searches. Use different combinations of his name and the word “speech”. It comes up in several sources including Newsmax. I just hate them so I wouldn’t link them. Still. It feels hoaxie. That’s why I’m asking if anyone has evidence of it being fake.
 
Last edited: