Katie Hill (D-CA) admits today to inappropriate relationship with female staffer

  • You are viewing Orangepower as a Guest. To start new threads, reply to posts, or participate in polls or contests - you must register. Registration is free and easy. Click Here to register.

CocoCincinnati

Federal Marshal
Feb 7, 2007
17,166
24,192
1,743
Tulsa, OK
#42
It is hard for imagine that we have anyone like this in Congress who is allowed to continue to represent us. Where is the call for her resignation?
She's a Dem. If she was a Rep, there would be howls of outrage by the media and DNC and they would demand her immediate resignation. But since she's a Dem, the media absolutely doesn't care, the DNC isn't going to say anything and even quite a few Reps are like "meh, let her constituents decide".
 
Oct 7, 2015
1,811
1,113
243
St. Elmo, CO
#43
Ahhh.....Pokey's liberal protective panties in a wad?! Perhaps a little time spent in the panic room will make you feel better. After that, we'll go out for vegan and White Claws.
The ease with which you magnify your opponent’s corruption is only exceeded by your willingness to ignore your sides corruption. Painfully laughable.
And what corruption would that be, Pokey?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Oct 7, 2015
1,811
1,113
243
St. Elmo, CO
#44
Ahhh.....Pokey's liberal protective panties in a wad?! Perhaps a little time spent in the panic room will make you feel better. After that, we'll go out for vegan and White Claws.
The ease with which you magnify your opponent’s corruption is only exceeded by your willingness to ignore your sides corruption. Painfully laughable.
The hypocrisy in this one is strong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Sep 29, 2011
727
136
593
60
Breckenridge, CO
#46
The hypocrisy in this one is strong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hypocrisy and projection....he's actually does EXACTLY what he's accusing you of.
Here’s the crazy part.
Any hint of corruption by the GOP usually results in massive investigations and guilty verdicts, some deserved.
Any clear example of corruption by the Dems usually results in elevated political status, almost never deserved.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

wrenhal

Territorial Marshal
Aug 11, 2011
8,228
3,827
743
49
#47
A friend of mine told me that if you go to Reddit and then....well, GTS* the article and they have the site the photos are on.

I was disgusted by the revelation and the photos.
Such outrageous, sinful acts and statements of carnal knowledge by former roommates of the Congresswoman and her husband.

It was like watching a train wreck over and over and over and over and over.
It took up most of the afternoon.
But after gathering all of the evidence, I found her guilty.
I found myself a little guilty too.

I'll show myself out.
My friends is still waiting to find out what this gts thing is.

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
 

steross

Bookface/Instagran legend
A/V Subscriber
Mar 31, 2004
27,146
32,277
1,743
oklahoma city
#48
She's a Dem. If she was a Rep, there would be howls of outrage by the media and DNC and they would demand her immediate resignation. But since she's a Dem, the media absolutely doesn't care, the DNC isn't going to say anything and even quite a few Reps are like "meh, let her constituents decide".
Hypocrisy and projection....he's actually does EXACTLY what he's accusing you of.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Kat...Wq0KHeAvAO44ChDy0wMIZg&biw=1612&bih=857&dpr=2

What do you mean the media doesn't care? It is on CNN, NYT, WaPo, ABC, NBC etc and of course all the right ones. The only one not covering it is MSNBC but that entertainment channel obviously gave up being actual news a long time ago. Everyone knows the biases of media. Fox has nearly as many viewers as CNN and MSNBC combined so what difference does any of that even make?

You have @docjoctoo calling for a resignation of a single congresswoman as "not representing us" while not calling for the resignation of the president who (at least had people) violate/violated campaign laws paying off porn stars for sex when he actually does represent all of us.

The finger pointing from either side is laughable. It is absolute fantasy that there is any real difference at all in either side of our modern politics. It is all the same wretched mess from the exact same type of people. It is like trying to seriously debate if Randy Savage or Hulk Hogan was the meanest wrestler by pointing out things the other one did. By having no real dog in this hunt listening to you guys go back and forth dissecting imagined details as if there is an actual material difference in the sex scandals of the left vs the right looks like insanity.
 

steross

Bookface/Instagran legend
A/V Subscriber
Mar 31, 2004
27,146
32,277
1,743
oklahoma city
#49
Here’s the crazy part.
Any hint of corruption by the GOP usually results in massive investigations and guilty verdicts, some deserved.
Any clear example of corruption by the Dems usually results in elevated political status, almost never deserved.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Love to see the data to back this assertion.
 
Sep 29, 2011
727
136
593
60
Breckenridge, CO
#50
Here’s the crazy part.
Any hint of corruption by the GOP usually results in massive investigations and guilty verdicts, some deserved.
Any clear example of corruption by the Dems usually results in elevated political status, almost never deserved.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Love to see the data to back this assertion.
Off the top of my head.....
GOP
Trump
Flynn
Manafort
Papodoplis
Giuliani (on the come)
D’Souza

Dems
Hillary (multiple instances)
Bill Clinton
Obama
Holder
Lynch
Biden
Biden jr
Warren
Menendez





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

NotOnTV

BRB -- Taking an okie leak
Sep 14, 2010
8,681
6,443
743
Gondor
#51
Off the top of my head.....
GOP
Trump
Flynn
Manafort
Papodoplis
Giuliani (on the come)
D’Souza

Dems
Hillary (multiple instances)
Bill Clinton
Obama
Holder
Lynch
Biden
Biden jr
Warren
Menendez





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dems:
  • Susan Rice
  • FISA abuse
  • Peter Strzok
  • Lisa Page
  • Comey squashing Hillary Investigation
  • Clinton/Lynch tarmac meeting to talk about "grandkids" (see above)
  • Ilan Omar brother marriage
  • Tlaib's connections to Hamas and Fatah
  • Ocasio-Cortez funneling campaign cash to boyfriend
I could go on all day, to name a few..
 

steross

Bookface/Instagran legend
A/V Subscriber
Mar 31, 2004
27,146
32,277
1,743
oklahoma city
#52
Off the top of my head.....
GOP
Trump
Flynn
Manafort
Papodoplis
Giuliani (on the come)
D’Souza

Dems
Hillary (multiple instances)
Bill Clinton
Obama
Holder
Lynch
Biden
Biden jr
Warren
Menendez





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dems:
  • Susan Rice
  • FISA abuse
  • Peter Strzok
  • Lisa Page
  • Comey squashing Hillary Investigation
  • Clinton/Lynch tarmac meeting to talk about "grandkids" (see above)
I could go on all day
Listing names is not data. For example:
Al Franken- resigned
John Conyers- resigned.
Anthony Weiner- resigned
Virtually all the Harvey Weinstein #metoo fallout people were liberals- Lauer etc

And, I could go on and on with this and also with names of republicans that survived sex scandals and prospered (prime example being the current president).

But, that doesn't matter because when I talk to liberals they complain about the republicans getting away with it and you guys complain about the dems. Fact is, they all get away with it except when they can't. It is no different. The only difference is your own perception.

What I was asking for was actual data, a researched, comprehensive list with people over a specfic time period that shows different sex scandal outcomes based on party. I really don't think it exists because there is no difference.
 
Sep 29, 2011
727
136
593
60
Breckenridge, CO
#53
Listing names is not data. For example:
Al Franken- resigned
John Conyers- resigned.
Anthony Weiner- resigned
Virtually all the Harvey Weinstein #metoo fallout people were liberals- Lauer etc

And, I could go on and on with this and also with names of republicans that survived sex scandals and prospered (prime example being the current president).

But, that doesn't matter because when I talk to liberals they complain about the republicans getting away with it and you guys complain about the dems. Fact is, they all get away with it except when they can't. It is no different. The only difference is your own perception.

What I was asking for was actual data, a researched, comprehensive list with people over a specfic time period that shows different sex scandal outcomes based on party. I really don't think it exists because there is no difference.
I'll say it again...……...

Here’s the crazy part.
Any hint of corruption by the GOP USUALLY results in massive investigations and guilty verdicts, some deserved.
Any clear example of corruption by the Dems USUALLY results in elevated political status, almost never deserved.

There are exceptions and you found a few.
 

steross

Bookface/Instagran legend
A/V Subscriber
Mar 31, 2004
27,146
32,277
1,743
oklahoma city
#54
I'll say it again...……...

Here’s the crazy part.
Any hint of corruption by the GOP USUALLY results in massive investigations and guilty verdicts, some deserved.
Any clear example of corruption by the Dems USUALLY results in elevated political status, almost never deserved.

There are exceptions and you found a few.
A few. LOL, there were hundreds just from #metoo alone.

I'll say it again too....

USUALLY conservatives claim that it is their side that gets screwed over in corruption claims. And USUALLY liberals tell me the same damn thing. Yet, NEITHER side can do anything other than make anecdotal claims based on their perception of events which are always biased. This is PROVEN by your "hint" vs "clear example" statement when there are hints and clear examples on both sides. Again, perceived single-side persecution is exactly what the other side says just in reverse. Interestingly, often the clear examples get away with it, and the hints suffer, regardless of party.

Maybe you will figure out that they are the same con artists playing the same con just picking different marks. There is no real difference no matter how badly you want there to be one. That is why there is no data on this. If it existed to support either side, you know an outlet biased toward that side would have it out there.
 

NotOnTV

BRB -- Taking an okie leak
Sep 14, 2010
8,681
6,443
743
Gondor
#55
The problem is that the least little whiff of wrong-doing by a Republican garners infinite media attention and calls for investigation designed to make one side look like they are constantly breaking the law and/or subverting the Constitution. However, prima facia evidence of crimes, many of which I listed, like an FBI official texting his illicit love interest that he would make sure the election go against Trump, doesn't even get a yawn from the same parties.
 

NotOnTV

BRB -- Taking an okie leak
Sep 14, 2010
8,681
6,443
743
Gondor
#56
Oh, and where's the data? Have you asked this of the Dims and their media lackeys? All I hear about are these mysterious dossiers (fake), "sources", and "whistle-blowers".
 
Sep 29, 2011
727
136
593
60
Breckenridge, CO
#58
I'll say it again...……...

Here’s the crazy part.
Any hint of corruption by the GOP USUALLY results in massive investigations and guilty verdicts, some deserved.
Any clear example of corruption by the Dems USUALLY results in elevated political status, almost never deserved.

There are exceptions and you found a few.
A few. LOL, there were hundreds just from #metoo alone.

I'll say it again too....

USUALLY conservatives claim that it is their side that gets screwed over in corruption claims. And USUALLY liberals tell me the same damn thing. Yet, NEITHER side can do anything other than make anecdotal claims based on their perception of events which are always biased. This is PROVEN by your "hint" vs "clear example" statement when there are hints and clear examples on both sides. Again, perceived single-side persecution is exactly what the other side says just in reverse. Interestingly, often the clear examples get away with it, and the hints suffer, regardless of party.

Maybe you will figure out that they are the same con artists playing the same con just picking different marks. There is no real difference no matter how badly you want there to be one. That is why there is no data on this. If it existed to support either side, you know an outlet biased toward that side would have it out there.
I’m talking about politicians. Everyone already knows the majority of “me too” offenders are liberal. But they’re not the ones running the country.
Please pay attention.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Feb 11, 2007
4,204
1,906
1,743
Oklahoma City
#59
Well, she doesn’t represent “us” she represents a specific district and the people of her district will decide if she will continue to represent them.
Every Representative, while elected by their District also votes and passes law that affect each one of us.
In that sense they represent each of us.