House expected to Impeach Trump ??..announcement at 3pm CST

  • You are viewing Orangepower as a Guest. To start new threads, reply to posts, or participate in polls or contests - you must register. Registration is free and easy. Click Here to register.
Sep 6, 2012
1,873
856
743
Edmond
I really feel sorry for people who believe in a draft dodging, serial adulterer and serial con artist (just admitted to running a scam foundation for which he paid a $2MM settlement and is banned from running a foundation) over veterans who have put their lives on the line for our country and have sworn under oath that the president committed bribery in an extortion attempt. But I feel more sorry for our country. It’s not being done in secret. There are over a thousand pages of sworn testimony in the public. Not one R who has been in the hearings has contradicted the released testimony. Turn off Fox or Limbaugh and read the transcripts for yourself.
Ummm , Are you talking about Clinton? either one or both.
 
Oct 12, 2019
133
18
18
29
Dustin,ok
Orange Man Bad ! CNN,ABC,NBC CBS Good they are real news would never coverup Epstein, Clinton’s, Avanatti, same ole same ole, double down, double down. But truth will win out or our Republic is lost.They can’t beat DJT45, they can’t get rid of him, watch for the JFK solution.
 
Sep 6, 2012
1,873
856
743
Edmond
He's right...he currently has no protection while they smear him. Also the more it goes on the more it's coming out that this has been a plan hatched from the beginning by the left and an anti trump whistle blower, his lawyer who has been Publicly on twitter salivating about impeachment since election day, a former ambassador who was recalled and has lied about communications with the Democrat's while under oath (personal e-mails were obtained last night that detail these communications). This is an extreme political hack job on a duly elected, by the people, President. They have kept it mostly in secret due to their desire to control the narrative. While the POTUS may have stepped into this trap...a trap has certainly been laid by those who have been salivating about possible impeachment since day 1 and can't accept that the people of the United State of American have a say in who is elected. Attempts to make this appear unbiased are just that, don't fall for them. Here's the deal, this is upsetting and I don't even like the man...he's an arrogant prick, but he's our arrogant prick and he does tend to put the country and it's people first...this scam is likely going to only result in his easy , re-election, not sure why the democrat's in congress think otherwise.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ma...-emails-house-democrat-staffer-delicate-issue
 
Dec 9, 2013
471
176
593
49
Ummm , Are you talking about Clinton? either one or both.
I guess just Trump since he’s the one who admitted to running a scam foundation, paid a $2MM settlement and is banned along w his family from operating a charitable foundation.

Also Trump since he released a memo where he demonstrated that he engaged in bribery in an attempt to extort a foreign government to investigate a US citizen and political rival. And said memo has been backed up by 2 US vets, a Trump appointee who gave a $1MM to Trump’s inauguration and an aide to VP.

But you guys can go ahead and cling to emails again. If she lied under oath about them & it can be proven then charge her.
 
Feb 7, 2007
17,166
24,192
1,743
Tulsa, OK
There are over a thousand pages of sworn testimony in the public. Not one R who has been in the hearings has contradicted the released testimony. Turn off Fox or Limbaugh and read the transcripts for yourself.
There are people who were on the call who have contradicted the sworn testimony....of course they haven't been called to testify and they certainly aren't getting mentioned by the media. Turn off CNN or the Washington Post and think for yourself.

Trump mat very well be guilty of what he is being accused but quit pretending that the investigation hasn't been entirely one sided up to this point. Once (if) it moves into the trial mode, then "defense" witnesses will be called to testify and the whole thing will become one big he said/he said.
 
Dec 9, 2013
471
176
593
49
So are you insinuating something nefarious by linking this? The implication from the headlines is that she was asked if she responded to an email from a congressional staffer about an investigation and she responded w details then withheld that info from congress.

The reality and even the article addresses this is that she responded cordially and professionally and indicated she had forwarded the email on appropriately. She should have admitted she replied and given details which if true show nothing sinister. But let’s crucify her for being the target of a Russian mob plot backed by the President’s attorney w probable knowledge from the Pres to remove her from service.
 
Dec 9, 2013
471
176
593
49
There are people who were on the call who have contradicted the sworn testimony....of course they haven't been called to testify and they certainly aren't getting mentioned by the media. Turn off CNN or the Washington Post and think for yourself.

Trump mat very well be guilty of what he is being accused but quit pretending that the investigation hasn't been entirely one sided up to this point. Once (if) it moves into the trial mode, then "defense" witnesses will be called to testify and the whole thing will become one big he said/he said.
Except he said which in this case are Trump’s own words. It’s not about the call. It’s the fact admitted by the Pres, his CoS and an aide to the VP among others that the Pres engaged in a bribery scheme in an attempt to extort a foreign govt to investigate a US citizen and political rival.

I don’t watch CNN and don’t read the Washington Post or NY Times. Just follow the public information.
 

Binman4OSU

Legendary Cowboy
Aug 31, 2007
29,856
15,824
1,743
Stupid about AGW!!
After weeks of complaining and even staging a fake outrage barring into private behind close door bipartisan impeachment hearings

Trump goes on the South Lawn of the WH this morning and argues the impeachment hearings should NOT be done in public!!!

So all the people in this thread who complained about the hearings behind closed doors...as of this morning you are officially not in line with Trump who wants them Private now.....So not sure how you spin that

:lol::lol::lol::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...st-impeachment-they-shouldnt-be-having-public
 
Sep 6, 2012
1,873
856
743
Edmond
So are you insinuating something nefarious by linking this? The implication from the headlines is that she was asked if she responded to an email from a congressional staffer about an investigation and she responded w details then withheld that info from congress.

The reality and even the article addresses this is that she responded cordially and professionally and indicated she had forwarded the email on appropriately. She should have admitted she replied and given details which if true show nothing sinister. But let’s crucify her for being the target of a Russian mob plot backed by the President’s attorney w probable knowledge from the Pres to remove her from service.
I was putting supporting info from @Rack post that I replied too
 

Binman4OSU

Legendary Cowboy
Aug 31, 2007
29,856
15,824
1,743
Stupid about AGW!!
Rep Mark Meadows who is a staunch Trump supporter is now throwing Rudy G under the bus. Saying basically that Trump didn't direct Rudy to do anything on Ukraine and Rudy went rogue and did it all on his own. Say Trump wasn't aware of what Rudy was doing.

Cept in the memo of the call released Trump specifically told the Ukraine president to work directly with Rudy G.
 

Jostate

CPTNQUIRK called me a greenhorn
A/V Subscriber
Jun 24, 2005
18,773
13,887
1,743
After weeks of complaining and even staging a fake outrage barring into private behind close door bipartisan impeachment hearings

Trump goes on the South Lawn of the WH this morning and argues the impeachment hearings should NOT be done in public!!!

So all the people in this thread who complained about the hearings behind closed doors...as of this morning you are officially not in line with Trump who wants them Private now.....So not sure how you spin that

:lol::lol::lol::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...st-impeachment-they-shouldnt-be-having-public
I'll spin it the way I spin everything Trump related. If he's guilty of something significant bounce him out on his ass. If he's not let him do his job. If others have done something similar they should be investigated as vigorously.

I don't have the patience to stick with this whole story but that Schiff made up transcript did not help the Democrat's cause. If it's so bad just read the details, don't make stuff up.
 
Oct 7, 2008
1,209
281
1,713
He's right...he currently has no protection while they smear him. Also the more it goes on the more it's coming out that this has been a plan hatched from the beginning by the left and an anti trump whistle blower, his lawyer who has been Publicly on twitter salivating about impeachment since election day, a former ambassador who was recalled and has lied about communications with the Democrat's while under oath (personal e-mails were obtained last night that detail these communications). This is an extreme political hack job on a duly elected, by the people, President. They have kept it mostly in secret due to their desire to control the narrative. While the POTUS may have stepped into this trap...a trap has certainly been laid by those who have been salivating about possible impeachment since day 1 and can't accept that the people of the United State of American have a say in who is elected. Attempts to make this appear unbiased are just that, don't fall for them. Here's the deal, this is upsetting and I don't even like the man...he's an arrogant prick, but he's our arrogant prick and he does tend to put the country and it's people first...this scam is likely going to only result in his easy , re-election, not sure why the democrat's in congress think otherwise.
He has an entire media conglomerate whose sole purpose the last three years has been to convince you guys he's never done anything wrong in his life...
 
Feb 11, 2007
4,204
1,906
1,743
Oklahoma City
He has an entire media conglomerate whose sole purpose the last three years has been to convince you guys he's never done anything wrong in his life...
No....just the opposite..the media giants, the NYT, Washington Post, CNBC and CNN have repeatedly published
rumors later proven false about Trump. The public now has grown to doubt of anything they report.
 
Dec 9, 2013
471
176
593
49
I'll spin it the way I spin everything Trump related. If he's guilty of something significant bounce him out on his ass. If he's not let him do his job. If others have done something similar they should be investigated as vigorously.

I don't have the patience to stick with this whole story but that Schiff made up transcript did not help the Democrat's cause. If it's so bad just read the details, don't make stuff up.
Schiff made a major strategic blunder when he over dramatized Trump’s Memo. It was an unforced error that gave Trump and his allies a stump to stand on. It is a complete lie that he made up the transcript ahead of the release as Trump has said.

But let’s not that get in the way of the fact that Trump committed bribery in an attempt to extort a foreign government into investigating a political rival. Any of which are impeachable offenses among others that Trump should be investigated for.
 
Oct 7, 2008
1,209
281
1,713
No....just the opposite..the media giants, the NYT, Washington Post, CNBC and CNN have repeatedly published
rumors later proven false about Trump. The public now has grown to doubt of anything they report.
Yes, and most people on this board only surround themselves with Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Breitbart, etc. ensuring the only time they hear about WP, MSNBC, CNN, etc is when they screw up on a story. To most people on this board liberal media exists entirely outside the bubble they've built around themselves. It's only there as a caricature for them to vilify.

I'm not saying there isn't a liberal media conglomerate as well. I'm just saying to argue that half the country is being fed a sole narrative by their liberal media bubble while they themselves are surrounded by their own conservative media bubble looks a little like tossing stones while living in glass houses.
 

wrenhal

Territorial Marshal
Aug 11, 2011
8,228
3,827
743
49
Orange Man Bad ! CNN,ABC,NBC CBS Good they are real news would never coverup Epstein, Clinton’s, Avanatti, same ole same ole, double down, double down. But truth will win out or our Republic is lost.They can’t beat DJT45, they can’t get rid of him, watch for the JFK solution.
Really your ignorant young schtick is getting old. Please stop doing copy/paste of Q type posts. Try to make intelligent posts please.

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk