sidebar

VOTE! Election thread

  • You are viewing Orangepower as a Guest. To start new threads, reply to posts, or participate in polls or contests - you must register. Registration is free and easy. Click Here to register.

What will be the results of todays vote?

  • Trump wins big

    Votes: 11 14.1%

  • Trump wins small

    Votes: 12 15.4%

  • No decision by tomorrow morning

    Votes: 29 37.2%

  • Biden wins small

    Votes: 17 21.8%

  • Biden wins big

    Votes: 9 11.5%
  • Total voters
    78
wrenhal

wrenhal

Federal Marshal
#8,541
Aug 11, 2011
10,501
4,170
743
#8,541
cowboyinexile said:
wrenhal said:
You keep bringing up that lie. The Trump campaign has only had 3 or 4 lawsuits. All those other ones were individual citizens, or local candidates bringing up suits for whatever reason. Nothing to do with Trump directly.

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Yeah. If you believe the individual lawsuits weren't directed by the Trump administration, I've got some ocean front property in Guymon available real cheap.
Click to expand...
So you don't have any proof either. Just assuming.
Every 2 years at major election time there are lawsuits. It is common at the local and state level for both Democrats and Republicans to try to get recounts or ballots thrown out in hopes of getting enough votes to sway an isolated election.
Unless those lawsuits are brought by the lawyers for team Trump and say the plaintiff is the Trump campaign then I really doubt they are nothing more than business as usual.
I've seen some people also say they saw fraud and were suing for those reasons. Those people were, once again, individuals and may be Republicans, but that doesn't mean Trump or his lawyers had anything to do with the lawsuits.

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
PanhandleCowboy

PanhandleCowboy

Point Guard
A/V Subscriber
#8,542
Jun 22, 2006
5,129
3,654
1,743
Not Close Enough to Stillwater
#8,542
Is the world coming to an end...

Cuomo Defends Trump against ‘Unprofessional’ and ‘Really Biased’ Media

https://www.yahoo.com/news/cuomo-defends-trump-against-unprofessional-134627352.html

However, during the subsequent interview with WAMC’s Alan Chartock, Cuomo said reporters had adopted a “nastier tone” and “disrespect that never existed” toward politicians.

“The way they question President Trump at some of these press conferences is just—I’ve never heard that tone with the president,” Cuomo said. “There are reporters who just are unprofessional, don’t know the facts and ask really biased questions….You want to say ‘well I don’t like the president and I disrespect him,’ I know but it’s still the office of the president.”
Click to expand...
 
3

311Cowboy

Deputy
#8,543
Feb 7, 2007
1,633
241
1,693
Denver
#8,543
wrenhal said:
So you don't have any proof either. Just assuming.
Every 2 years at major election time there are lawsuits. It is common at the local and state level for both Democrats and Republicans to try to get recounts or ballots thrown out in hopes of getting enough votes to sway an isolated election.
Unless those lawsuits are brought by the lawyers for team Trump and say the plaintiff is the Trump campaign then I really doubt they are nothing more than business as usual.
I've seen some people also say they saw fraud and we're doing for those reasons. Those people were, once again, individuals and may be Republicans, but that doesn't mean Trump or his lawyers had anything to do with the lawsuits.

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Give us a link to democrats suing to have ballots thrown out in 2018 and 2016 then.
 
3

311Cowboy

Deputy
#8,544
Feb 7, 2007
1,633
241
1,693
Denver
#8,544
wrenhal said:
Cancel culture is getting people fired and doxxing them because you don't like their views. Using the free market to choose a different product is not. Even if the goal is to reduce consumption of the competing product until it goes away.
Cancel culture is aimed usually at an individual or a small group.


Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Weird Fox news wrote a whole article about how cancel culture was used on Goya Beans and confederate statues. Those aren't people are they?

https://www.foxnews.com/tech/cancel-culture-algorithms-big-tech-orchestrate
 
Cimarron

Cimarron

It's not dying I'm talking about, it's living.
#8,547
Jun 28, 2007
53,292
17,930
1,743
#8,547
wrenhal said:
It is common at the local and state level for both Democrats and Republicans to try to get recounts or ballots thrown out in hopes of getting enough votes to sway an isolated election.
Click to expand...
People should study the dishonorable tactics used by Obama in 1996 when he challenged opponents' petitions and forced them off the ballot.

If anyone thinks the Democrats today are above such methods to get elected, they are mistaken. This moral high ground they claim, is simply not the case.
 
3

311Cowboy

Deputy
#8,548
Feb 7, 2007
1,633
241
1,693
Denver
#8,548
Cimarron said:
People should study the dishonorable tactics used by Obama in 1996 when he challenged opponents' petitions and forced them off the ballot.

If anyone thinks the Democrats today are above such methods to get elected, they are mistaken. This moral high ground they claim, is simply not the case.
Click to expand...
The difference of course being those were legit lawsuits that had evidence... so the courts agreed.

Only a minor difference to the current screaming fraud with no evidence whatsoever and taking 30+ loses in the courts.

A better comparison would be fighting to keep Kanye off ballots cause he had fake signatures. That also happened.
 
Cimarron

Cimarron

It's not dying I'm talking about, it's living.
#8,549
Jun 28, 2007
53,292
17,930
1,743
#8,549
311Cowboy said:
The difference of course being those were legit lawsuits that had evidence... so the courts agreed.

Only a minor difference to the current screaming fraud with no evidence whatsoever and taking 30+ loses in the courts.

A better comparison would be fighting to keep Kanye off ballots cause he had fake signatures. That also happened.
Click to expand...
What evidence?

Again, can you please point to a law or something in the constitution that the Trump lawsuits are not legal?

If you can't then why are you wanting to deny him his constitutional rights?
 
3

311Cowboy

Deputy
#8,550
Feb 7, 2007
1,633
241
1,693
Denver
#8,550
Cimarron said:
What evidence?

Again, can you please point to a law or something in the constitution that the Trump lawsuits are not legal?

If you can't then why are you wanting to deny him his constitutional rights?
Click to expand...
Where am I saying he cannot sue?

The evidence for those cases about signatures went through the courts. So I have no burden to show evidence. The court did that already.
 
steross

steross

he/him
A/V Subscriber
#8,551
Mar 31, 2004
30,251
31,992
1,743
oklahoma city
#8,551
wrenhal said:
Cancel culture is getting people fired and doxxing them because you don't like their views. Using the free market to choose a different product is not. Even if the goal is to reduce consumption of the competing product until it goes away.
Cancel culture is aimed usually at an individual or a small group.


Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
I think you mean when people on the right use the free market is it not but when people on the left do it then it is cancel culture:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/watc...urrendered-to-nasty-censorious-cancel-culture
 
Cimarron

Cimarron

It's not dying I'm talking about, it's living.
#8,552
Jun 28, 2007
53,292
17,930
1,743
#8,552
311Cowboy said:
Where am I saying he cannot sue?

The evidence for those cases about signatures went through the courts. So I have no burden to show evidence. The court did that already.
Click to expand...
He had no evidence UNTIL AFTER he filed objections. He simply on the last day filed objections to the legitimacy of the nominating petitions for each of his opponents. Interesting he did it late so that no one challenged his nominating petitions.
 
3

311Cowboy

Deputy
#8,553
Feb 7, 2007
1,633
241
1,693
Denver
#8,553
Cimarron said:
He had no evidence UNTIL AFTER he filed objections. He simply on the last day filed objections to the legitimacy of the nominating petitions for each of his opponents. Interesting he did it late so that no one challenged his nominating petitions.
Click to expand...
Oh man, effectively enforcing election rules. With that level of competence. He probably went on to win a lot of elections afterwards.
 
Cimarron

Cimarron

It's not dying I'm talking about, it's living.
#8,554
Jun 28, 2007
53,292
17,930
1,743
#8,554
311Cowboy said:
Oh man, effectively enforcing election rules. With that level of competence. He probably went on to win a lot of elections afterwards.
Click to expand...
Again, you claimed he had evidence. He had no evidence when he filed objections.

What Obama did was legal, just as what Trump is doing is legal. So, why the double standard?
 
3

311Cowboy

Deputy
#8,555
Feb 7, 2007
1,633
241
1,693
Denver
#8,555
Cimarron said:
Again, you claimed he had evidence. He had no evidence when he filed objections.

What Obama did was legal, just as what Trump is doing is legal. So, why the double standard?
Click to expand...
What double standard? Trump can sue to his heart's content. He has done it his whole life.

Not conceding after a loss and trying to disenfranchise voters are what most are complaining about.

Oh and lying about evidence too. He is free to lose 30+ lawsuits for all I care.

This guy has him covered! WINNING!

1606328667949.png
 
Coolfogg

Coolfogg

Deputy
#8,556
Sep 6, 2012
2,311
949
743
Edmond
#8,556
Cimarron said:
What evidence?

Again, can you please point to a law or something in the constitution that the Trump lawsuits are not legal?

If you can't then why are you wanting to deny him his constitutional rights?
Click to expand...
Pennsylvania judge halts election certification amid mail-in vote fight | Fox News

Pennsylvania judge halts election certification amid mail-in vote fight

A Pennsylvania state court issued an injunction Wednesday blocking any potential further certification of election results in the state, pending a hearing to be held Friday.
 
3

311Cowboy

Deputy
#8,557
Feb 7, 2007
1,633
241
1,693
Denver
#8,557
Coolfogg

Coolfogg

Deputy
#8,558
Sep 6, 2012
2,311
949
743
Edmond
#8,558
311Cowboy said:
This only affects down ballot elections. The presidential results have already be certified.

View attachment 87344
Click to expand...
While the presidential election results in Pennsylvania have already been certified, the Trump campaign is still actively fighting them, hoping for decertification as they appeal the dismissal of a case they brought alleging that voters were improperly granted the ability to cure invalid absentee votes, and in which they alleged that more than 680,000 ballots were counted without proper observation.

from the article
 
Cimarron

Cimarron

It's not dying I'm talking about, it's living.
#8,560
Jun 28, 2007
53,292
17,930
1,743
#8,560
John Kerry as climate czar.

This should be a joke, sadly though it’s real.

Six houses, 12 cars, 2 yachts, and a private jet.

And he’s going to tell you to take the bus to work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.