Didn't the IPCC issue a new report? What? Nothing?

  • You are viewing Orangepower as a Guest. To start new threads, reply to posts, or participate in polls or contests - you must register. Registration is free and easy. Click Here to register.

CaliforniaCowboy

Federal Marshal
Oct 15, 2003
14,425
2,203
1,743
So Cal
#1
holy cow....

from what I gather, they're now backpedaling, and pushing their complete disaster scenario back another decade or so, because the effects of man-warming isn't as bad as they predicted....

and even at that, their prediction is 50%...... that's right 50/50..... flip a coin

catastrophic destruction or not? spin, spin, spin, spin..... HEADS!

I guess it's no wonder that I haven't seem much about it in the press yet...

oh yeah, I think they also said that there is no evidence that storms, or droughts will be more severe... but they're still sticking with more frequent.
 

CaliforniaCowboy

Federal Marshal
Oct 15, 2003
14,425
2,203
1,743
So Cal
#3
I was about to move on to something more interesting when this tweet from Eric Holthaus, a writer for the deep greenie site Grist, caught my eye:



Amazing how you can always count on supposed physical scientists to turn out to be political scientists (and economists, too)